Legal Opinion

Frank R. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 26, 1985No. 51-84TPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEPENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

In this tax refund action, plaintiffs, Frank R. and Bertha M. Kretchmar, jointly seek a refund of federal income taxes, interest, and penalties in the amounts of $19,-006.05, $27,404.64, and $24,250.02 for the taxable years 1976, 1977, and 1978, respectively. Plaintiffs claim that they were unlawfully assessed the foregoing additional amounts based upon an erroneous calculation of gross income for each of the years in question. Further, plaintiffs claim that the penalties assessed are without foundation in fact or in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. International Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Tucker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  4. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Affiliated Companies v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Lambropoulos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API