Legal Opinion

Harris v. Charles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 2009No. 61629-3-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

f 1 —A statute entitles felons detained before trial on electronic home monitoring to be credited for the time served. No statute entitles misdemeanants to the same credit. In view of the differences between felony and misdemeanor sentencing, we hold this distinction is rational and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause.

FACTS

¶2 Respondent Joshua Harris was charged in Seattle Municipal Court with one count of driving while license suspended in the third degree (DWLS Third) and one count of operating a vehicle without an ignition interlock device. *933He posted bail of $5,000 and began…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Of Washington, V. James Laron EllisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. In Re The Welfare Of: K.m.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API