Harris v. Charles
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 Washington’s Criminal Rules authorize a trial judge to release a person before trial subject to electronic home monitoring (EHM). If convicted of a felony, the defendant is entitled to have the days spent on pretrial EHM credited against any sentence of confinement. Petitioner Joshua Harris pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors and seeks credit for time spent on EHM, arguing that allowing EHM credit for felons but not misdemeanants violates his right to equal protection of the law.
¶2 We hold that there are rational bases for treating felons and misdemeanants differently when crediting EHM:…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Michael Anderson v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. DeskinsWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.