Legal Opinion

Zoltek Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 9, 2003No. 96-166 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment alleging that 28 U.S.C. § 1498(c) barred Plaintiff from receiving reasonable compensation under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) for infringement of Plaintiffs U.S. Patent No. Re. 34,162 (hereinafter, “Re. ’162 Patent”). The Re. ’162 patent teaches a process for making a silicon fiber sheet product used in the production of F-22 fighter planes. Because the fibers that form the sheet product are manufactured in a foreign country, and the manufacturing of the fibers is part of the patented process, this Court…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Zoltek Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API