Ginsberg Tile Co. v. Faraone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOODELL, J., pro tem.
This appeal was taken on the judgment-roll' alone from an order granting the motion of the respondents to dismiss. The action was commenced in the name “Ginsberg Tile Company, a copartnership, plaintiff,” and the appeal was taken in the same name.
The facts are that on May 25, 1926, a complaint was filed by “Ginsberg Tile Company, a copartnership,” against Salvatore Faraone and Jennie Faraone, his wife, defendants, alleging that certain work had been done by the plaintiff upon the improved real property of the defendants, under an agreement between them whereby plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Clement v. British American Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- United Investors Life Insurance v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ginsberg v. FaraoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Heinfelt v. ArthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.