Wise v. Williams
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The demurrer of the defendants Hallinan, administrator of the estate of Sarah Connell,, deceased, and J. B. Connell, a minor, by Hallinan, his, guardian, was sustained, and plaintiff having refused to. amend, judgment was entered in favor of said defendants, for costs of the action. The grounds of demurrer are,, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that the cause of action is barred by the provisions of section 337 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that there is a defect or misjoinder of parties plaintiff in this: that said note and mortgage…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Hallock v. JaudinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- In re Estate of SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- McCord v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Cameron v. CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.