Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Fitzke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1951No. 35,466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment declaring that defendants have no right, title, or interest in or to certain farm premises other than as tenants.

We are primarily concerned with the question whether the defendants, by virtue of a so-called option clause contained in a farm lease and a subsequent oral agreement, have acquired a right to pur chase the demised premises from their lessor to the exclusion of a third-party purchaser. Plaintiff Clifford A. McCloskey, herein called McCloskey, is the owner or lessor. E. W. Johnson, the other plaintiff, herein called Johnson, is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Chournos v. Evona Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Nafstad v. MerchantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Wurdemann v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. DaLee Realty, Inc. v. KuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API