Legal Opinion
Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 1, 1967No. 40136, 40274PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial, and from the judgment entered thereafter.
On June 22, 1961, Twin Plaza Company was the owner of a 23-acre tract of land near the intersection of Rice and Montana Streets in the city of St. Paul. Efforts to develop this site as a mercantile shopping center occurring before and after that date brought about litigation between plaintiff Target Stores, Inc., standing in the shoes of the buyer, and defendant Twin Plaza…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Haggerty v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Futuresource LLC v. Reuters Limited Reuters S.A. And Reuters America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- In the Matter of Wonderfair Stores, Inc. Of Arizona, Debtor. Sam Jonas, Trustee-Appellant v. Walgreen Arizona Drug Co., Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Mary Ann LevittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hommerding v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.