State v. Berberich
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
This is an interlocutory appeal by the State pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3603 from the trial court’s order that statements made by defendant Thomas R. Berberich to Dr. Don Strong, a counselor, were privileged pursuant to K.S.A. 74-5323.
The issue is simple. The answer is complex. Dr. Strong was not a licensed counselor when the alleged statements by Berberich were made. By statute, confidential relations and communications between a licensed professional counselor and a counselor’s clients are privileged. However, K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 65-5810 states…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ShoptawCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- Garcia v. Estate of ArribasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014