Legal Opinion

State v. Berberich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 16, 1999No. 81,640PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is an interlocutory appeal by the State pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3603 from the trial court’s order that statements made by defendant Thomas R. Berberich to Dr. Don Strong, a counselor, were privileged pursuant to K.S.A. 74-5323.

The issue is simple. The answer is complex. Dr. Strong was not a licensed counselor when the alleged statements by Berberich were made. By statute, confidential relations and communications between a licensed professional counselor and a counselor’s clients are privileged. However, K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 65-5810 states…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShoptawCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  2. Garcia v. Estate of ArribasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API