State v. Bliss
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
The State brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s pretrial ruling that under State v. Crossman, 229 Kan. 384, 624 P.2d 461 (1981), other instances of sexual misconduct between the defendant Richard Bliss and the complaining witness, G.W., would not be admissible at trial. The district court reasoned that Crossman permits only evidence of prior acts and, alternatively, the prior acts were not sufficiently similar in nature to the underlying acts in the pending criminal complaint. We reverse and remand because Crossman does not preclude admission of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LumleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- State v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- State v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
- State v. Quinones-AvilaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019