Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2003No. 81755PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anne L. Kilbane, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered after a bench trial before Judge Burt W. Griffin. Luster Watson claims that his conviction for robbery through the use or threat of immediate force, as described in R.C. 2911.02(A)(3), is invalid because it is not a lesser included offense of robbery through the attempt, infliction, or threat of physical harm, as described in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2), and that he was indicted only for the latter offense. We affirm.

{¶ 2} On March 11, 2002, then fifty-year-old Watson was arrested after stealing lotion from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. Musselman, 22210 (1-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. Scott, Ca2008-06-149 (3-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In Re Young, Unpublished Decision (8-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API