In Re Young, Unpublished Decision (8-31-2007)

DECISION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Joseph Young appeals his sentence imposing multiple prison terms for robbery1 and receiving stolen property.2 Young's assignments of error are (1) that the trial court erred in imposing multiple prison terms when robbery and receiving stolen property are allied offenses of similar import, and the crimes were not committed separately or with a separate animus; and (2) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not raise the issue of allied offenses. But robbery and receiving stolen property are not allied offenses of…