Legal Opinion

State v. Musselman, 22210 (1-30-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 2009No. 22210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Mark Musselman appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, one count of aggravated theft by deception, and numerous counts of forgery involving a value of more than $100,000, forgery involving a value of between $5,000 and $100,000, and tampering with government records.

{¶ 2} Musselman advances seven assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in overruling a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Second, he claims the trial court erred in allowing the State to impeach him with evidence that had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RanceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. GrantOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MusselmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Edwards, 22648 (3-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. RieskeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API