State v. Musselman, 22210 (1-30-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Mark Musselman appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, one count of aggravated theft by deception, and numerous counts of forgery involving a value of more than $100,000, forgery involving a value of between $5,000 and $100,000, and tampering with government records.
{¶ 2} Musselman advances seven assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in overruling a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Second, he claims the trial court erred in allowing the State to impeach him with evidence that had…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RanceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GrantOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MusselmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Edwards, 22648 (3-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. RieskeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014