Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jordan v. Ingram

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1973No. 10494Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

Plaintiff-appellant’s complaint generally alleges that the defendants-respondents have committed five actionable wrongs against the plaintiff: (1) That the defendants have denied plaintiff ingress and egress to her property from the alley by the erection of the stone wall along line FGH; (2) That the defendants have committed trespass against the plaintiff by the erection of the wall and the planting of flowers to the north of line FGH upon the property of the plaintiff; (3) That the plaintiff has a right of way across the northerlymost portion of the defendants’ property between points C and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alman Brothers Farms & Feed Mill, Inc. v. Diamond Laboratories, Inc., and Southwestern Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Eugene O'COnnOr v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API