Legal Opinion
Nassau Insurance v. Ebin
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis Wallach, J.
This is a motion by the petitioner for leave to renew and reconsider its prior motion to stay arbitration of a "no-fault” insurance claim.
*514On petitioner’s original motion to stay arbitration, this court determined that threshold questions relating to alleged conditions precedent to recovery under no-fault insurance policies are to be decided by arbitration rather than by the courts. This determination was based on the broad arbitration provision of the Insurance Law (§ 675, subd 2) and the equally broad arbitration clause in the approved policy form of insurance promulgated by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. NorthSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & BrutonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Nassau Insurance v. McMorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Litchsinn v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Zurich Insurance v. EvansCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
- Banner Casualty Co. v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.