Legal Opinion

Banner Casualty Co. v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1976Published

1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.

Part of the legislative design of the "no-fault” auto liability statute (Insurance Law, § 670 et seq.) traces the removal of certain motor vehicle accident cases from the courthouse. To the extent that design is clear, cases which cannot enter through the front door should find the back door locked as well. The disputative key is arbitration.

After Ruth Fox was injured in an auto accident, she filed for first-party benefits under the "no-fault” law with Banner Casualty Company. First-party benefits are available to an auto accident victim from the insurer of the victim’s own car regardless of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & MaloneNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. In re the Arbitration between Green Bus Lines, Inc. & BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Musolino v. American Consumer InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Nassau Insurance v. EbinNew York Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API