State v. Raul Sanchez
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Raul C. Sanchez (Sanchez) appeals from his conviction in the Twentieth Judicial District, Sanders County, of deliberate homicide. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues as follows:
¶3 Did the District Court improperly allow Aleasha’s statements to be introduced over Sanchez’s hearsay objections?
¶4 Did the introduction of Aleasha’s note violate Sanchez’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation?
¶5 Did the prosecutor’s closing argument deny Sanchez the right to a fair trial?
¶6 Did the “lesser included offense” language of the mitigated deliberate homicide instruction impermissibly allow the jury to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. LindbergMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. NormanMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Moua HerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. BonamarteMontana Supreme Court · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.