Legal Opinion

State v. Norman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. DA 09-0235PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Kurt J. Norman was convicted following a jury trial in the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, of unlawfully possessing game animals. He now appeals, arguing (1) that the District Court improperly instructed the jury and (2) that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 In 2006, the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP) commenced an investigation of Norman based on information that he had been involved in unlawful hunting activities in Hunting District 270 (HD 270). This district, located southeast of Hamilton,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ReimMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. M. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MainMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. RoundstoneMontana Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API