Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Dannenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2009No. H030031PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

Petitioner John Ernest Dannenberg has been incarcerated since 1986 for the second degree murder of his wife. Although he has had numerous parole hearings, he has repeatedly been found unsuitable for parole due to the gravity of the commitment offense. In 2005, the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) decided that Dannenberg was suitable for parole and granted him parole, but the Governor reversed the Board’s decision. While the Governor conceded that every factor other than the gravity of the commitment offense favored a finding that Dannenberg is suitable for parole, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re VicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In re RynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. In Re MasonerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. In re CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. In re HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API