Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Hunter

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2012No. A131580PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1532Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Petitioner James Hunter seeks habeas corpus relief from the denial of parole by respondent Board of Parole Hearings (the Board). After carefully considering the restatement of the governing principles of review in In re Shaputis (2011) 53 Cal.4th 192 [134 Cal.Rptr.3d 86, 265 P.3d 253] (Shaputis II) we do not find “some evidence” to support the Board’s conclusions or an articulation of a rational basis for finding that Hunter would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety if paroled. Therefore, we remand the matter to the Board for reconsideration in light of this opinion.

Fac…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re Palermo on Habeas CorpusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. In re SwaniganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. In re DenhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API