Legal Opinion

In re Copley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2011No. C063289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, P. J.

Appellant, the warden of Deuel Vocational Institution (the Warden), appeals from the remedy ordered by the trial court in its order granting respondent Randy Copley’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found Governor Schwarzenegger’s November 2008 decision was not supported by “ ‘some evidence,’ ” failed to contain clear citation to the *430evidence relied upon, and failed to articulate a “ ‘rational nexus’ ” between the evidence in the record and the Governor’s determination that Copley is unsuitable for parole. Accordingly, the trial court vacated the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. In re PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. In re ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. In re MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. In re SenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API