Legal Opinion
In re Ryner
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2011No. H035893PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
In this appeal by the People, we review whether the superior court properly granted Chester L. Ryner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Ryner’s habeas corpus petition arose from a January 2010 decision by then Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (the Governor) to reverse the August 11, 2009 decision of the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board), which had granted Ryner parole. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the superior court was correct in granting Ryner’s petition for habeas corpus relief.
Procedural Background
On March 18, 2010, Ryner filed a petition for writ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re MorgantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.