Legal Opinion
Bath Iron Works Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 6, 1994No. 93-5119PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the November 12, 1992 order of the United States Court of Federal Claims (CFC), 27 Fed.Cl. 114 (1992), 1 denying its motion to dismiss Bath Iron Works Corporation’s (BIWs) claims for price adjustments under two shipbuilding contracts either for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, because the claims were not submitted to the Contracting Officer (CO) within the 18-month time period of 10 U.S.C. § 2405 (1988). The CFC concluded that the time period of 10 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ace Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.