Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Whitehead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1999No. 90313PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 The appellant, George Bryan Whitehead, brought a post-divorce proceeding on October 29,1996, to terminate support alimony and insurance coverage to the appellee, Minnie Amelia Whitehead. The appellant, who had been the plaintiff in the divorce, granted September 25,1995, claimed that the decree was void on its face because the support alimony obligation violated the “sum certain” requirement found in Mayhue v. Mayhue, 1985 OK 68, 706 P.2d 890; Clark v. Clark, 1969 OK 141, 460 P.2d 936; and Munsey v. Munsey, 1963 OK 225, 385 P.2d 902. The appellee answered that the orders contained in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Holleyman v. HolleymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Ingram v. KnippersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Younge v. YoungeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API