Legal Opinion

Younge v. Younge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 2002No. 93,288PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

1 This certiorari presses for decision two questions: (1) Can a husband be required by the divorcee decree to maintain a term insurance policy on whose proceeds the wife is granted a lien to secure the payment of due and unpaid alimony? and (2) Did the trial court err in its award of support alimony to the wife? We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

12 Hunter Fred Younge III [husband or appellant] and Barbara A. Younge [wife or appellee] were married on 8 August 1969. Two children were born of the union, both of whom have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Ray v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Marriage of Burrell v. BurrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Konczyk v. KonczykNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Peyravy v. PeyravySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API