Legal Opinion

Holleyman v. Holleyman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 2003No. 95,584PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

[ 1 Our question involves the enforceability of a divorcee decree by which the parties purport to agree "to leave the child support open after the minor child reaches the age of eighteen and/or complete high school ..." *924based on the needs of the child, if any. The parties agree that the child is a “special needs” child with some degree of retardation and seizure problems.

¶2 Mother and Father divorced in 1993 when their child was fifteen years old. Father stopped providing medical insurance in 2000. Mother then sought an order from the District Court to (1) compel Father to provide medical…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API