Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Abb

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 1986No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 24, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

We here determine that Irving V.M. Abb is guilty of professional misconduct in the handling of a decedent’s estate, and that a sixty day suspension from the practice of law is the appropriate sanction.

The misconduct occurred in Abb’s handling of the estate of Sarah Elizabeth West, and principally consists of neglect, DR 6-101(A)(3), and of charging a clearly excessive fee, DR 2-106(A). Abb does not take issue with the finding of neglect, but he does except to certain findings of fact, and to findings that he was otherwise guilty of misconduct.

The respondent is fifty-nine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaranoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Wright v. NuttleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API