Attorney Grievance Commission v. Marano
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Philip S. Maraño, alleging violations of the Disciplinary. Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 b, to Judge Thomas Ward of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Judge Ward made the following findings:
“FACTS
“The Petitioner produced documentary evidence plus the testimony of Salvatore Glorioso and William Allen,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaranoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AbbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaranoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.