Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Steigman
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided September 14, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowdrey, P.J.
This is an action in contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the unpaid balances of, interest on and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in the collection of, two promissory notes co-signed and executed by the defendant.
The trial court granted the plaintiffs Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 56 motion for summaryjudgment. Damages in the amount of $45,123.00 plus $56.73 in costs were assessed, and judgment was entered for the plaintiff.
1. The defendant’s liability for the promissory note at issue was conclusively established pursuant to Rule 56 in the trial court. The plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bollen v. Camp KingsmontMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Bifano v. Patten's Plumbing & Heating Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- Eastern Tank of Peabody, Inc. v. MooreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- Kurker v. National Grange InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988
- Little v. EllisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.