Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Safety Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 18, 1996No. 94-P-1879PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

Two of the plaintiffs are family members: Dorothy Ellis and Hayde Little are daughter and mother. The third plaintiff, Anthony Goodnews Eneonye (Goodnews), and Little are friends and housemates. Ellis, Little and Goodnews appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them on all six counts of their complaint, which essentially arises out of Ellis’s ownership of a Jaguar automobile insured by defendant Safety Insurance Co. (Safety). Safety refused to settle Ellis’s claim after she reported her automobile stolen. The plaintiffs allege that, in the process of investigating Ellis’s claim,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Brazas Sporting Arms, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Polay v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Hanover Insurance v. LeedsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Lorenzo-Martinez v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API