Legal Opinion

Heinrich v. Globe Indemnity Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 2, 1964No. 1 Div. 19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by insured from a decree declaring that insurer is not obligated, under the terms of a “MANUFACTURERS’ AND CONTRACTORS’ LIABILITY POLICY,” to defend insured in an action for personal injury and is not liable to pay any judgment which may be rendered against insured in said action.

*520Insured is in the lumber business and exports lumber. The policy contains the following provisions:

“GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY
“Agrees with the Insured, named in the declarations made a part hereof, in consideration of the payment of the premium and in reliance upon the statements in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TorranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Wheeler v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bokulich v. Jury Commission of Greene County, AlabamaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  2. Shoney's LLC v. MAC EAST, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Davis v. SheehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Transit Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Greene v. RaymondDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API