Legal Opinion

Markley v. Carbondale Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1903No. 13,268PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from .Osage district court. J. T. Pringle, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.:

This action was brought by A. C. Markley against the Carbondale Investment Company to recover possession of, and rents and'profits accruing from, an eighty-acre tract of land. In March, 1899, the investment company conveyed the property to H. .W. and I. D. Burdick, taking a mortgage on the premises to secure a promissory note given as evidence of the entire purchase-price agreed to be paid for the land. Default having been made in payment of the mortgage debt, an action to foreclose this mortgage was brought in Osage county, and the venue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swarts v. SteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  2. Carbondale Investment Co. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Walton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Bryant v. FordyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Marshall v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Good v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Julian v. Eagle Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API