Legal Opinion

Julian v. Eagle Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1910No. 16,653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Neosho district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

In a petition for a rehearing it is urged that a material fact was overlooked in the opinion. (Ante, p. 127.)

It appeared upon the trial that the assignment of the lease from Parsons to the Eagle Oil and Gas Company was recorded more than two years after the contract upon which the plaintiff sued had been entered into, and that the plaintiff had no notice of the terms of the assignment. The plaintiff now insists that he is not bound by the provision of the assignment by which the lease was to revert to Parsons, not only because it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Northwestern Forwarding Co. v. Mahaffey, Slutz & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Markley v. Carbondale Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Exchange National Bank v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Bryant v. FordyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Marshall v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. James Currin Bergin, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Vernon Waterson, in the Matter of W. G. Schafer, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Overlander v. OverlanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API