Legal Opinion

Carbondale Investment Co. v. Burdick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1897No. 10036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Hon. W. A. Randolph, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

March 12, 1889, the plaintiff in error sold and conveyed a tract of eighty acres of land to defendants in error. Contemporaneously with this sale and conveyance, and as a part of the same transaction, the defendants in error executed a note and mortgage to the plaintiff in error for the entire purchase price, $4,672, due in two years from date.. The note contained an agreement for the annual pay*518ment of interest. The mortgage stipulated for the payment of taxes on the land by the mortgagors, and declared that the entire debt should become due upon default in the payment of either interest or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. StassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Markley v. Carbondale Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Burdick v. Carbondale Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API