Legal Opinion

Swarts v. Stees

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1864PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Shawnee Coimty, On January 19th, 1860, defendant Stees executed his note and mortgage to plaintiffs on land described therein, as the E. & of S. E. Sec. 14, T. 13, R. 14, May 14th, 1862, plaintiffs commenced action to foreclose the mortgage, setting forth a mistake in. the description of the land, in this, that it should have been the E. i of N. E. J of said Section, and asked a reformation of the mortgage.

Read the full summary

Error from Shawnee Coimty, On January 19th, 1860, defendant Stees executed his note and mortgage to plaintiffs on land described therein, as the E. & of S. E. Sec. 14, T. 13, R. 14, May 14th, 1862, plaintiffs commenced action to foreclose the mortgage, setting forth a mistake in. the description of the land, in this, that it should have been the E. i of N. E. J of said Section, and asked a reformation of the mortgage. On application the defendants, Bryan & Hardcastle, at the Spring Term of Court were made parties defendants. Defendant Stees made default. Defendants Bryan & Hard-castle…

1Opinion of the Court

*241By the Court,

Crozier, C. J.

The only question necessary to be decided in this case is as to the priority of the liens of the mortgage and judgment. It is insisted by the judgment creditors that because there was no mortgage describing the lands they seek to subject under their judgment upon the records of the County, nor had they any notice of such mortgage, nor was there in fact any such mortgage in existence, their judgment became the first lien upon the lands from the date of its rendition; that they had no notice of the existence of any incumbrance upon the land when their judgment was…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holden v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Harrison v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Hamilton v. Washington Mutual Bank FACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Lee v. BerminghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API