Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Brixey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1936No. 25986PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial court Samuel Brixey and Della Brixey instituted this action, number 11305, against the State Highway Commission for the recovery of damages to real property resulting from the method of construction of highway improvements, and alleged to cause the destruction of plaintiffs’ filling station and grocery business, and to cause certain of plaintiffs’ lands to be subject to overflow 'from backwater, which was forced across the lands of others and onto plaintiffs’ land.

In a former action, numbered 10937, the state, in exercise of the power of eminent domain, had maintained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. HeissIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lowrance v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Graham v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Henry v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API