Farley v. Reindollar
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff having performed certain street work upon a street of the city of Oakland under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), brought his suit to foreclose an assessment lien on the property of defendant Reindollar. A general demurrer to his complaint was sustained and from the judgment which followed plaintiff has appealed.
It is conceded that in all respects saving one the complaint is sufficient. The particular in which it was found to be insufficient is the following: The complaint alleged that a protest against the doing of the proposed work was made by certain owners of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stoner v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Southern Construction Co. v. HowellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Keller v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Federal Construction Co. v. KneeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Page v. MintzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Page v. MintzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.