O. M. Gaudy, Inc. v. North Carolina Home Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action is based upon a rider attached to an automobile insurance policy, issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, covering loss through the theft of a car by the vendee upon a conditional sales contract. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining a recovery in the sum of $715.10. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.
The facts are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: One ¥m. Kyle resided at Florence, Oregon, and owned a Hudson automobile upon which there was a' California license plate. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Brady v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
- Overland-Reno Co. v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Ogle Lake Shingle Co. v. National Lumber InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bohnen International Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Central Surety Fire Corporation v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Southeast Portland Lumber Co. v. HeacockOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Sholund v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Reliable Credit Ass'n v. Progressive Direct InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.