Southeast Portland Lumber Co. v. Heacock
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The uncontradicted evidence establishes, that when the defendant found his business in a precarious condition, and himself confronted with grave possibility of bankruptcy, he called upon the Adjustment Bureau Portland Association of Credit Men at the suggestion of a friend. Here he explained in full his financial condition to a Mr. Ingram, manager of the Bureau; the latter’s advice was that the defendant should authorize the Bureau to issue a call for a meeting of his creditors. The defendant accepted this advice and upon the same day the Bureau issued a request that all of the creditors of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hyland v. HylandOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Welch v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Howard v. TettelbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. GambleOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Osborn v. KetchumOregon Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Wolfgang v. Henry Thiele Catering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Brown v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Holmberg v. Prudential Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Cohn v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.