Legal Opinion

Ludemann v. Specialty National Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 20, 2009No. AC 30156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this underinsured motorist case, the plaintiffs, William Ludemann and Laura Ennis, formerly known as Laura Ludemann, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their application to vacate the arbitration award rendered in favor of the defendant, Specialty National Insurance Company. The resolution of the appeal concerns the interaction between the exclusive remedy of our Workers’ Compensation Act; see General Statutes § 31-284 (a); 1 and the statutory exception to that exclusivity set forth in General Statutes § 38a-336 (f). 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Gomes v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Sansone v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Ludemann v. Specialty National InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 2008

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ludemann v. SPECIALTY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Ludemann v. Specialty National InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API