Sansone v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs, James Sansone and Roberta Sansone, appeal from a summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to them, does not establish, as a matter of law, that termite infestation proximately caused the damage to their residence and (2) their loss *527was excluded from coverage under their homeowners policy. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In their complaint, the plaintiffs…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Keyes v. Pennsylvania General Accident InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- McCommic v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Sansone v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
4Cited by8 opinions
- Yale University v. Cigna InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Hritz v. SacoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Viking Construction, Inc. v. 777 Residential, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. ZachemConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Ludemann v. Specialty National InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.