Legal Opinion

Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Russo

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1992No. S-4408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Salvatore Russo, a long-time participant in the Bristol Bay Red Salmon Fishery, applied for and was denied a Bristol Bay Drift Gill Net Entry Permit. The Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission (CFEC) found that Russo was entitled to only thirteen points under applicable regulations. Seventeen were necessary for a permit. Russo appealed the CFEC’s decision to the superior court which found that Russo was entitled to receive past participation points under the unavoidable circumstances clause of 20 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 05.630(5). The court reasoned that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. TempletonAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ByayukAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Copeland v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Estate of Basargin v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. ALASKA COM. FISHERIES ENTRY COM'N v. RussoAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API