Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of De Force

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

It will be noticed from the statement that the petition attacking the validity of the marriage of Mary H. De Force, formerly known as May Wing, with Elton Clayton De Force, the deceased, for the purpose of showing that Mary H. De Force is not the lawful widow of her deceased husband, failed to directly allege that Mary H. De Force or May Wing was ever married to Charles Wing, against whom the proceedings for a divorce was instituted in the Circuit Court for Clatsop County. The petition also fails to show that at the time of the admitted marriage of Mary H. De Force, then May Wing, with Elton…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In re Estate of MegginsonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ollschlager's Estate v. WidmerOregon Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Pilcher's Estate. Von Pilcher v. PilcherUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Faggard v. FilipowichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Briggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Kolombatovich v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API