Legal Opinion
Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. Attorney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1922No. 12495PublishedCited by 49 opinions
Error from District Court, Greer County; T. P. Clay, Judge. Action between D. A. Hudgens and the State, on the relation of M. H. Mills, county attorney of Greer county. From the judgment, the former brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
On October 5, 1921, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, to which motion no response has been filed. The third ground of the motion is:
“That the case-made herein was not signed, served and settled as required by law, in 'that the time for serving said case-made expired on June 25, 1921, while the record was served on June 1, 1921, and the same was signed and settled on June 20, 1921, and before the ten days allowed by the court to this defendant in error to make and suggest amendments had expired.”
These grounds are fully sustained by the record, and must be sustained.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummings v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Enid v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Wilson v. BraniganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Brockhaus v. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Marsh v. Van Allen MarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Parker v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Welch v. All PersonsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.