Legal Opinion

Briggs v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1950No. 47586PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

Plaintiff sues to recover certain sums which he claims became due him during the period from May 11, 1942, to March 7, 1946, representing monetary allowances in lieu of quarters on account of a dependent wife while plaintiff was *643a noncommissioned naval officer, and increased rental and subsistence allowances on account of a lawful wife while plaintiff was a commissioned officer.

The statutory bases for plaintiff’s claims are found in sections 4, 5, 6, and 10 of the Act of June 16,1942 (66 Stat. 359) and in the amendment to section 4 contained in the Act of May 15,1947 (61 Stat. 92), as follows:

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Oborn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Sleicher v. SleicherNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Schneider v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Century '21' Shows and Kenneth Wayne O'Guin v. Charles W. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Bertha Tatum v. Oscar TatumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Harsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  5. Collins v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API