Legal Opinion

State v. A.S.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1999No. 66997-0PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— Three individuals subject to detention under chapter 71.05 RCW, the involuntary civil commitment act (the Act), challenge the propriety of their 14-day *901involuntary confinements. Each claims the social worker who testified to the bases for their confinement lacked the qualifications to testify about their alleged mental disorders. Sheldon and Lucas also claim the trial court should have dismissed their petitions because the statutorily required signatories had not signed them.

We hold, under the unique circumstances of the Sheldon and Lucas petitions, the statutory signature requirements for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of AsWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Detention of H.N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API