Legal Opinion
Diamond v. Cross
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1983No. 48707-3PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Appellant, Eloise Cross, was a gravely disabled person involuntarily committed for less restrictive *375outpatient treatment pursuant to RCW 71.05.320.1 Respondents sought revocation of Ms. Cross' less restrictive treatment, on the ground that she had failed to comply with its conditions. Court Commissioner Krilich found that Ms. Cross had complied with the conditions but nonetheless ordered her returned to inpatient status because it would be dangerous to allow her to remain free. We reverse on two alternative grounds: (1) The Court Commissioner had no authority, absent a finding of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schmidt v. LessardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.