Legal Opinion

People v. Sherman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1954No. Crim. 2981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendant Fong appeals from his conviction of one count of conspiracy to commit abortion and one count of abortion, and from the order denying a new trial.

Questions Presented

1. Sufficiency of the evidence. 2. Refusal to set aside the indictment as to counts 2 and 3. 3. Alleged errors in the admission of evidence. 4. Refusal to grant mistrial. 5. Instructions. 6. Alleged misconduct of district attorney.

Record

Defendants Pong, Sherman, Ostrofsky, and Kirkpatrick were indicted jointly on four counts: (1) conspiracy to perform abortions on certain women including Mrs. Wallace and other women…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. MeansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. BuckmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API