Legal Opinion
Stayman v. McKellop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 3, 1933No. 24430PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLISON, V. C. J.
This is an original proceeding by O. O. Stayman and/or New Hotel Tulsa, and Globe Indemnity Company, petitioners, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made in favor of Albert McKellop on January 5, 1933.
The record discloses that the case was considered by the Commission upon a stipulation of facts, which stipulation recites that on March 24, 1932, while employed by the New I-Iotel Tulsa to work jointly in the Hotel Bakeshop and to drive the hotel delivery and pick-up truck, claimant received an accidental injury while unloading a deski at another hotel,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Southwestern Grocery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. MolloySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ferris v. BonitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sims v. St. Anthony HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Chatham v. Arrow Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Renner v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Kelly v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McBee v. HaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.