Legal Opinion

State v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1996No. C9-95-907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge. *

Defendant Herbert Saunders was tried on a gross misdemeanor charge of practicing medicine without a license under Minn.Stat. § 147.081, subd. 3(3) (1994). After a mistrial resulting from a deadlocked jury, the trial court certified the following question as important and doubtful:

Is Minnesota Statute Section 147.081, Practicing Medicine Without a License, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States and the Minnesota Constitution?

The state moves to strike a portion of Saunders’ appellate brief because it addresses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LilleskovCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. BRIARDCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API