State v. Saunders
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge. *
Defendant Herbert Saunders was tried on a gross misdemeanor charge of practicing medicine without a license under Minn.Stat. § 147.081, subd. 3(3) (1994). After a mistrial resulting from a deadlocked jury, the trial court certified the following question as important and doubtful:
Is Minnesota Statute Section 147.081, Practicing Medicine Without a License, unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States and the Minnesota Constitution?
The state moves to strike a portion of Saunders’ appellate brief because it addresses…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LilleskovCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BRIARDCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010